« what comes around | Main | me too »
googlewhack
Here you go. Don't know what all the fuss is about, it only took about two minutes.
mr mcmuffin on 10 Mar 2005 @ 11:11 PM ✲ Permalink
Comments
What? What is that supposed to show us? I just see some rubbish in Google (and I mean rubbish).
Posted by: Steve | 11 Mar 2005 08:54:01
Who cares? The idea is to get a single entry. If you click on it, it will take you to a site. It looks like some kind of spam thing. But, who cares? I did it, that's all that matters, and it only took me mere minutes. Not that hard really!
Posted by: mr mcmuffin | 11 Mar 2005 08:59:23
It's easy, once you know how. Yes, that's another one. I'm just working my way through an old shopping list!
Posted by: David (TEFL Smiler) | 11 Mar 2005 12:28:33
Oh, I see. I had no idea what a Googlewhack is supposed to be. See, like I said, I was missing something ;-)
Posted by: Steve | 11 Mar 2005 17:55:50
Sadly it doesn't qualify as a googlewhack as both words need to be underlined on the right, and also word lists are invalid (which is what this links to).
Posted by: Paul Wakeford | 23 Mar 2005 10:25:42
Someone's just making these rules up as they go along. Why on earth should both words need to be underlined (ie available as links) on the top, right-hand side of the Google page? And why are some words underlined and others not?
Posted by: David (TEFL Smiler) | 23 Mar 2005 13:00:14
5 days ago I'd never heard of googlewhacking. Then I buy a book about it and now I'm reading about it on your blog. I think Steve needs to borrow my book.
Posted by: Laura | 23 Mar 2005 21:44:29
both words have to be in blue and underlined on the top right so they have definitions in the internet to be valid. get the facts before you start boasting! :) maybe it isn't as easy as you thought...
Posted by: potato | 24 Mar 2005 16:40:15
Eh!? It's dead easy. You are wrong.
Posted by: mr mcmuffin | 24 Mar 2005 19:11:20
But that's just daft that answer.com doesn't have a definition for 'frogspawn' or 'endophora'. Why shouldn't a Googlewhack exist, just because some website with 'answers' (apparently) is seemingly inadequate? Who makes up these daft rules?
Posted by: David (TEFL Smiler) | 24 Mar 2005 20:42:18
Try not to feel bad, Davd. Just because you can't do a legitimate Googlewhack. It is God who makes up the rules. That's just life.
Posted by: mr mcmuffin | 24 Mar 2005 21:21:27
Roguish antiestablishmentarianism... there ya go that is a googlewhack. Found it by myself.
Posted by: ~$~wasted youth~$~ | 12 Apr 2005 04:22:33
Was a googlewhack.
Posted by: DeSi | 13 Apr 2005 20:03:01
lol it cos that underlinin means its in dictionary.com which is the googlewhackers dictionary of choice because it is googles dicionary of choice! u need to read or watch Dave Gormans Googlewhack adventure!
Posted by: Woody | 26 May 2005 16:34:26
